ArticleScientific reports2026
Rapid neurological recovery in Guillain-Barré syndrome treated with efgartigimod.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute Management of Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Efgartigimod for Guillain-Barré syndrome: rationale, clinical evidence, and future perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor that accelerates IgG degradation, remains understudied in treatment of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in GBS patients. A retrospective analysis included 17 GBS patients (5 patients treated by efgartigimod, 8 patients treated by IVIg, 4 patients treated by PE). Primary outcome is time to a one-point improvement in GBS-DS and time to regain unaided walking ability. GBS-DS score, Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score, Medical Research Council (MRC) scores, the proportions of patients with INCAT score ≤ 2 and those achieving full MRC score were recorded at baseline and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment. Adverse reactions were monitored throughout the treatment period. The patients treated by efgartigimod demonstrated significantly faster improvement of 1-point on the GBS-DS (4.00 days vs. IVIg: 7.00 days, PE: 11.50 days; p = 0.033) and higher proportions of patients with INCAT scores ≤ 2 (80% vs. 12.5% [IVIg], 25% [PE]; p = 0.039) and full MRC scores (80% vs. 12.5% [IVIg]; p = 0.045) at 1 week. Adverse events were mild (20% vs.50% PE). Efgartigimod offers rapid symptom relief and functional recovery in GBS compared to IVIg and PE. These findings highlight its potential as a novel therapeutic option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.