ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Outcomes following shunt for secondary hydrocephalus in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: a matched cohort study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effectiveness of surgical intervention for hydrocephalus in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDoC) remains controversial. To investigate the impact of ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) on secondary hydrocephalus patients with pDoC following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study based on age, duration and state of consciousness. Patients in the vegetative state/minimally conscious state (VS/MCS) with secondary hydrocephalus due to TBI/ICH who underwent VPS and non-VPS patients who served as a matched control group from March 2020 to September 2024 were included. Clinical data, surgical outcomes and related complications were compared between groups using descriptive/bivariate analyses. A PubMed review of the literature published between 2000 and 2024 was performed. Forty-seven patients in the VPS group were identified and matched to 47 patients in the non-VPS group during 6-month follow-up. Overall, 63.8% (30/47) of patients with pDoC improved consciousness after VPS. However, consciousness improved without intervention in only 6.4% (3/47) of patients with pDoC. Compared with the non-VPS group, the VPS group had a significantly better state of consciousness, periventricular edema and hypertonia (p = 0.037, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), and the VPS group had significantly improved Evan’s index, JFK coma recovery scale–revised (CRS-R) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (p < 0.001). VPS was significantly more effective in improving consciousness at a duration of 1–3 months, moderate-to-severe periventricular edema and high-pressure hydrocephalus. There was no difference in the incidence of complications between patients who underwent VPS related to complications in the patients with pDoC group and those in the conscious group (p = 0.963). There was no difference in the incidence of complications in the patients with pDoC between the VPS group and the non-VPS group (p = 0.930). In literature review, improvements in consciousness were observed in 60.6% (134/221) of patients with pDoC after the intervention. Improvement in consciousness was observed in only 6.9% (2/29) of patients with pDoC in the non-VPS group. VPS can improve patients with pDoC levels to some extent, and shunt did not reduce the overall complications of patients with pDoC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41851298What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.