ArticleScientific reports2026
Accelerating discovery of MOFs for hydrogen storage via machine learning in energy related applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrogen is a promising clean energy carrier, but its low energy density necessitates advanced storage solutions. Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) offer high tunability and porosity for efficient hydrogen adsorption. This work combines Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations with machine learning, employing Feed-Forward (FNN) and Pattern Recognition (PRNN) neural networks optimized via Equilibrium Optimizer and Genetic Algorithm. The integrated approach predicts gravimetric and volumetric hydrogen storage capacities across 98,695 metal-organic frameworks under temperature-pressure swing conditions. Pore volume and void fraction emerged as dominant structural descriptors. The models identified 12 top-performing MOFs exceeding MOF-5 in both gravimetric (8.27 wt.%) and volumetric (51.94 g-H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.