ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimizing sonication-assisted hydrodistillation of Cinnamomum tamala essential oil using response surface methodology and artificial neural network modeling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study optimized the sonication-assisted hydrodistillation (SAHD) process for extracting essential oil (EO) from Cinnamomum tamala leaves, aiming to maximize yield and antioxidant activity. Both response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were used to predict extraction performance. The interpretability of the ANN model was enhanced using a neural interpretation diagram (NID), Olden’s algorithm, and sensitivity analysis, and it demonstrated higher accuracy and generalization than RSM. Under optimized conditions, the EO yield reached 1.67 ± 0.13%, with strong antioxidant activity indicated by a total phenolic content (TPC) of 79.24 ± 0.82 mg GAE/g and 81.54 ± 0.88% inhibition of the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH). Residual analysis showed that both models satisfied key regression assumptions, including normality, independence, homoscedasticity, and lack of bias. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis identified linalool (47.37%), eugenol (18.34%), and cinnamaldehyde (16.45%) as key constituents. Physicochemical characterization verified EO quality and stability. The integrated modeling approach provides a robust framework for enhancing EO extraction efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.