ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Systematic reassessment of reported variants in individuals with suspicion of Alport spectrum disorder reveals a high rate of ambiguous results.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
"Alport spectrum disorder" describes a phenotypically and genotypically multifaceted disease entity encompassing classic autosomal recessive and X-linked Alport syndrome (AS) but also more heterogenous and typically milder, yet not benign, hematuric phenotypes like autosomal dominant AS, formerly also known as thin basement membrane nephropathy (TBMN). Alport spectrum disorder is associated with disease-causing variants in the type IV collagen genes COL4A3, COL4A4 and COL4A5. Variants and genotypes, reported by a genetic diagnostics lab between 2009 and 2014, of 91 index cases with the clinical tentative diagnosis of AS (66/91), TBMN (21/91), or AS/TBMN (not specified further; 4/91), were reassessed based on 2015 ACMG (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics) criteria and current amendments. 80 different variants, all originally reported as "mutations", and their genotypes have been reassessed (COL4A3: 21/80, COL4A4: 15/80, COL4A5: 44/80). In 10/80 variants, classification changed from disease-causing to variant of uncertain significance (VUS). 69/91 (76%) index cases included in the analysis could be classified as solved. 22/91 (24%) index cases had an ambiguous result either on variant, genotype, or both variant and genotype level. VUS cases had a significantly more limited phenotype (e.g., isolated microscopic hematuria) compared to non-downgraded cases (e.g., additional extrarenal manifestations). Reassessment of variants/genotypes in this study showed a significant reduction in unequivocal genetic diagnoses highlighting variant and genotype interpretation as a dynamic process. Genetic reports of individuals with suspected Alport spectrum disorder, especially those obtained in the pre-ACMG criteria era, should therefore be critically evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.