ArticleScientific reports2026
Phylogenetic relationship based on DNA barcodes and comparative analysis of phytochemical contents among Rhynchostylis orchids in Thailand.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial and Nuclear Markers Reveal Contrasting Patterns of Genetic Diversity in the Red Palm Weevil (Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhynchostylis orchids are native to Thailand and have considerable commercial importance. However, species delimitation remains difficult because of overlapping morphology, environmental plasticity, short flowering periods, and extensive horticultural hybridization. In addition, comprehensive molecular and phytochemical data for the genus remain limited. This study examined phylogenetic relationships among nine Rhynchostylis accessions and one Aerides species using the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and maturase K (matK) DNA-barcode regions, and further evaluated their phytochemical properties to support species identification, conservation, and superior genotype selection. The ITS and matK regions were amplified and sequenced, and phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using maximum likelihood (ML) and Neighbour-joining (NJ) approaches. These analyses generally recovered R. retusa and R. coelestis as distinct lineages from the R. gigantea complex. ITS showed slightly higher discriminatory power among closely related R. gigantea forms, whereas matK provided complementary phylogenetic structure. When interpreted together with diagnostic floral traits, these molecular data strengthened species delimitation within the genus. Phytochemical profiling of ethanolic leaf extracts revealed significant interspecific variation, with total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging activity ranging from 2.30 ± 0.32 to 11.38 ± 0.01 mg GAE/g DW, 1.47 ± 0.62 to 18.14 ± 0.33 mg RE/g DW, and 12.91 ± 0.09 to 42.17 ± 0.33 mg TE/g DW, respectively. R. gigantea ‘Chang Phlai’ consistently exhibited the highest phenolic content and antioxidant capacity, highlighting its potential pharmacological relevance. Collectively, this study demonstrates that integrating DNA barcoding with floral morphology and phytochemical evidence provides a baseline molecular and chemical framework that helps clarify taxonomic interpretation in Rhynchostylis. It may also inform future conservation assessments and sustainable utilization efforts for these economically and medicinally important orchids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.