ArticleScientific reports2026
A scaling up of flattening silver particles using dry ball milling by DEM simulation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rising demand for silver flakes, such as those used on solar cell electrodes, requires reliable scaling up of flattening silver particles. For this purpose, it was confirmed the applicability of the specific impact energy ([Formula: see text]) calculated from the discrete element method (DEM) simulation to the scale-up of flattening silver particles. The normalized specific surface area (SSA) at arbitrary flattening times at large scales was predicted by the flattening rate constant ([Formula: see text]) at small scales and [Formula: see text]. Silver particles were flattened in experiments using dry vibration mills of two different sizes under various conditions. [Formula: see text] was obtained through the increase in the normalized SSA during the flattening process. The simulations modeled the motion of the balls within the mills using DEM, and [Formula: see text] was calculated from the ball-ball and ball-wall collisions. To validate the scale-up, the predicted and experimental values of the normalized SSA at large scales were compared. A comparative analysis of prediction accuracy using various components of [Formula: see text] (normal, shear, and their total) was conducted. The results showed that the normal component of [Formula: see text] had the highest prediction accuracy. These findings suggest that the normal component of [Formula: see text] can be utilized to the scale-up of flattening processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.