ArticleScientific reports2026
Sketch recognition model based on improved CycleGAN network and dual attention mechanism.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To improve sketch recognition accuracy, this study proposes an enhanced sketch recognition model based on an improved CycleGAN network and a dual attention mechanism. The proposed model first incorporates multi-directional convolution and brightness equalization modules into the CycleGAN network to extract edge and contour features. A dual attention mechanism is then implemented using channel attention and spatial attention modules, effectively addressing issues of sparse strokes and uneven spatial distribution in sketches while enhancing the representation of critical features. Finally, a hybrid architecture combining global average pooling and convolution layers serves as the classifier to produce sketch recognition results. Simulation results demonstrate that this model achieves 97.08% accuracy, 98.12% precision, 98.23% recall, and 97.45% F1 score for sketch recognition on the TU-Berlin dataset, and 98.65% accuracy, 98.12% precision, 98.76% recall, and 97.95% F1 score on the QuickDraw dataset. Compared with state-of-the-art sketch recognition models, this model exhibits superior performance in accuracy. These results indicate that the model can enhance sketch recognition precision and provide technical support for converting sketches into high-quality animated images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.