Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851211›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Sketch recognition model based on improved CycleGAN network and dual attention mechanism.

Yun Wang, Li Xie, Mengyi Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yun WangDongguan University of Technology International School of Design Dongguan, GuangDong, 523808, China. wangyun12025@outlook.com.
Li XieDongguan University of Technology International School of Design Dongguan, GuangDong, 523808, China.
Mengyi HuangDongguan University of Technology International School of Design Dongguan, GuangDong, 523808, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve sketch recognition accuracy, this study proposes an enhanced sketch recognition model based on an improved CycleGAN network and a dual attention mechanism. The proposed model first incorporates multi-directional convolution and brightness equalization modules into the CycleGAN network to extract edge and contour features. A dual attention mechanism is then implemented using channel attention and spatial attention modules, effectively addressing issues of sparse strokes and uneven spatial distribution in sketches while enhancing the representation of critical features. Finally, a hybrid architecture combining global average pooling and convolution layers serves as the classifier to produce sketch recognition results. Simulation results demonstrate that this model achieves 97.08% accuracy, 98.12% precision, 98.23% recall, and 97.45% F1 score for sketch recognition on the TU-Berlin dataset, and 98.65% accuracy, 98.12% precision, 98.76% recall, and 97.95% F1 score on the QuickDraw dataset. Compared with state-of-the-art sketch recognition models, this model exhibits superior performance in accuracy. These results indicate that the model can enhance sketch recognition precision and provide technical support for converting sketches into high-quality animated images.

Indexed as

channel attention moduleCycleGAN networkdual attention mechanismsketch recognitionspatial attention module

Identifiers

PMID41851211
PMCPMC13133253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.