Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851209›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Epistemic uncertain computing for intrusion detection with explainability & multi-criteria optimization using AA-NLS and GRUSO-GRU.

K Kiruthika, M Karpagam, Tanvir H Sardar, Sk Mahmudul Hassan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K KiruthikaDepartment of Mathematics, K.S.Rangasamy College of Technology, Tiruchengode, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, 637 215, India.
M KarpagamDepartment of Computational Intelligence, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India. karpagam1@srmist.edu.in.
Tanvir H SardarDepartment of CSE, School of Engineering, Dayananda Sagar University, Devarakaggalahalli, Harohalli, Kanakapura Road, Bengaluru South Dt., 562112, India.
Sk Mahmudul HassanManipal Institute of Technology Bengaluru, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India. mahmudul.hassan@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to incomplete and inaccurate data, intrusion detection in networks is uncertain. The out-of-order packet arrival uncertainty was not analyzed in the existing works, thereby causing false positives in intrusion detection. So, in this paper, a novel Algebraic Average-based Neutrosophic Logic System (AA-NLS)-based out-of-order uncertainty analysis is proposed. Firstly, the nodes are initialized, and the data is sensed. Then, for intrusion detection, the Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) is trained. Here, the data is collected and pre-processed. At the time of pre-processing, Weighted Distance Error Function-based K-Nearest Neighbour (WDEFKNN) is utilized to impute the uncertainty caused by missing values. Further, utilizing the Density-Based Beta Distribution Soergel Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBBDSSCAN), the behavioural patterns are grouped. Then, the features are extracted, and by utilizing AA-NLS, the epistemic uncertainty caused by out-of-order packet arrival is analyzed. In the meantime, by utilizing the Hidden Laplace Witten Bell Markov Model (HLWBMM), the temporal patterns are assessed. Then, the intrusion is detected by the Generalized Riccati Uniform Scaling Orthogonal-based Gated Recurrent Unit (GRUSO-GRU). Here, utilizing the Pareto Entropy-based SHapley Additive exPlanation (PESHAP) model, the explainability of the intrusion detection is carried out. If there is no intrusion, then data transmission is continued. And, if there is intrusion, then the gathered alerts are prioritized and transmitted utilizing the multi-criteria-based Log-Cosh Fennec Fox Optimization Algorithm (LCFFOA). Hence, the intrusion is detected by the proposed framework with an accuracy of 99.299% under the full multi-class setting, demonstrating effective performance compared to prevailing Deep Learning (DL)-based NIDS approaches.

Indexed as

Behaviour analysiseXplainable artificial intelligence (XAI)Intelligent decision supportMulti-criteria optimizationNeutrosophic algebraUncertain computingUncertainty in intrusion detection

Identifiers

PMID41851209
PMCPMC13136297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.