Trial reportScientific reports2026
Efficacy of topical erythropoietin gel and mouthwash for recurrent aphthous stomatitis in a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06923605 (The Efficacy of Erythropoietin Oral Gel Versus Erythropoietin Mouthwash in the Management of Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Efficacy of Erythropoietin Oral Gel Versus Erythropoietin Mouthwash in the Management of Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study With Biochemical Analysis
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erythropoietin (EPO) has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and wound-healing properties that could be valuable in managing Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis (RAS). This study aimed to evaluate its clinical effectiveness in either gel in orabase or mouthwash, on pain reduction, ulcer healing, recurrence rates, and salivary IL-2 level in patients with RAS. In this randomized clinical trial, 60 patients with RAS were equally divided into 3 groups: EPO oral gel, EPO mouthwash, or a placebo. Ulcer size, the Pain Visual Analog Scale (P-VAS), and salivary IL-2 levels were evaluated at baseline, day 3, and day 7. When compared to a placebo, both EPO formulations significantly decreased pain, ulcer size, and salivary IL-2 levels (p < 0.001). With nearly total pain relief, significant ulcer healing, and the lowest post-treatment IL-2 concentration, the EPO gel group showed the greatest improvement. In comparison to mouthwash and a placebo, patients treated with EPO gel also had noticeably longer recurrence-free intervals (median 5 months). No negative effects noted. These findings suggest that EPO gel is a therapeutic option for RAS that is both safe and effective, with the potential to modify the disease in addition to relieving symptoms.Trial registration: The study was registered at Clinical Trials.gov (NCT06923605) on 11/4/2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.