Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851175›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Domain-agnostic weakly supervised surgical instrument segmentation.

Rebekka Peter, Doan Xuan Viet Pham, Philipp Matten, Erik Wu, Jonas Nienhaus, Felix Meissen, Martin J Menten, Eleonora Tagliabue, Franziska Mathis-Ullrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebekka PeterZeiss Innovation Hub @ KIT, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany. rebekka.peter@zeiss.com.
Doan Xuan Viet PhamZeiss Innovation Hub @ KIT, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Philipp MattenZeiss Innovation Hub @ KIT, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Erik WuZeiss Innovation Hub @ KIT, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Jonas NienhausCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Felix MeissenChair for AI in Healthcare and Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Martin J MentenChair for AI in Healthcare and Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eleonora TagliabueZeiss Innovation Hub @ KIT, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Franziska Mathis-UllrichDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in visual foundation models open new avenues in the field of surgical instrument segmentation in medical images. Segmentation foundation models provide high segmentation accuracy for objects of interest that are selected via prompts in the form of points, bounding boxes, or text. However, the choice of suitable prompts either requires manual interaction or relies on two-stage pipelines based on supervised, typically domain-specific models. This limits their applicability for domain-agnostic surgical instrument segmentation. We propose a method for surgical instrument segmentation that leverages the power of the segmentation foundation model SAM2 while eliminating the need for a user-defined input prompt or domain-specific annotated datasets. We achieve this by utilizing an anomaly detector generated from non-instrument images to identify instruments as unseen regions and in this way, define a SAM2 input prompt based solely on image-level annotations. For three datasets for surgical instrument segmentation from diverse domains (EndoVis2017, CaDIS, and PASO-SIS), we achieve mean Normalized Surface Distances ranging from [Formula: see text]. This demonstrates the competitiveness of our method compared to alternatives, while its training- and mask-free nature makes it well-suited for surgical workflow integration. By simplifying surgical instrument segmentation, we advance the field of computer-assisted surgery and unlock a wide variety of assistance functions with minimal effort.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSurgery, Computer-AssistedSurgical InstrumentsAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41851175
PMCPMC13003140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.