ArticleScientific reports2026
Update, translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of Nottingham Stroke Dressing Assessment into Spanish.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Nottingham Stroke Dressing Assessment (NSDA) is a scale for assessing the ability and independence to dress people who have suffered a stroke. The objective of this study was to update the original scale and create its Spanish version. The NSDA scale was reviewed, translated, cross-culturally adapted, and validated. A standardised multi-step translation and updating protocol was implemented to achieve optimal conceptual and semantic equivalence and validate it. The Spanish version was validated in 110 stroke survivors. The exploratory analysis generated 12 factors. Internal consistency was satisfactory (α = 0.92). Intra-rater reliability was high (ICC = 0.92). The correlation between the ENVI-R and the FMA was demonstrated and significant (r = 0.34–0.5). The updated, translated, and culturally validated Spanish version of this scale can be used reliably and validly in research and clinical practice after demonstrating adequate and significant psychometric properties. The use of these scales will improve the quality of stroke-dressing assessment and allow for reliable comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.