Trial reportScientific reports2026
Mixed-methods analysis on psychedelic-augmented meditation experiences from a randomized controlled mindfulness retreat.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The acute subjective effects (ASEs) of psychedelic substances are assumed to play a critical role for their therapeutic and well-being enhancing benefits. However, recent work voiced critique regarding the validity and adequacy of conventional measures and modalities utilized to study ASEs of psychedelics, and call for data-driven, unbiased, and experience-based research approaches. The emergence of advanced Natural Language Processing techniques as an enabler of data-driven qualitative research holds promise for addressing the current biases and limitations in the investigation of ASEs of psychedelics. In the present study, we employed an NLP-driven, multi-method analytical paradigm to study the subjective experiences of participants in an ecologically valid RCT examining the effect of DMT/harmine on meditative states in experienced meditators using phenomenological interviews. Our analysis showed differences in the thematic landscape and experiential diversity of meditation under placebo and meditation under DMT-harmine while showing overlap in their semantic topographies. The mixed-modal analysis successfully identified a wide range of well-established primary subjective effects while also detecting subtle, patterned regularities in language that traditional hypothesis-driven approaches alone may overlook. It revealed a pronounced use of Buddhist concepts and spiritual jargon to describe and integrate the subjective experience, independent of the experimental condition. Findings suggested shared experiential features between meditative and psychedelic states, a strong drug-context interconnection and potential synergistic effects of meditation and psychedelics. We advocate for using NLP-augmented, data-driven paradigms to deepen the understanding of psychedelic subjectivity and emphasize the importance of extra-pharmacological factors in shaping therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.