Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851156›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A wild fish image dataset for individual re-identification and phenotyping.

T K Sørdalen, K Malde, C Sauvaitre, A B Skiftesvik, C Beyan, T Larsen, K T Halvorsen

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

T K SørdalenInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway. tonjesordalen@gmail.com.
K MaldeInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
C SauvaitreInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
A B SkiftesvikInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
C BeyanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
T LarsenInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
K T HalvorsenInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 325862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer vision can transform wildlife monitoring by automating phenotyping and individual identification. Achieving this, however, depends on access to large, well-curated image datasets that capture natural variation across individuals and years. Here, we present Melops, a longitudinal dataset comprising 24 578 images of 9 861 individual corkwing wrasse, Symphodus melops, collected over seven years through a capture-mark-recapture survey. Each fish was PIT-tagged for re-identification and photographed from both sides against a standardized white background with a colour reference. Alongside the images, we provide metadata including body length, sex, and reproductive state. To support deep learning applications, the dataset includes both the original photographs and automatically cropped images focusing on the whole fish or specific body regions. Together, these resources provide a foundation for developing computer vision methods for individual re-identification, colour pattern analysis, sex classification and other visual phenotyping tasks. Beyond this species, Melops can serve as a model for similar datasets in other taxa. Because it contains thousands of individuals with repeated observations, it provides a rare opportunity to explore temporally aware re-identification and phenotypic change in wild fish.

Indexed as

FishesPhenotypeAnimalsDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID41851156
PMCPMC13149779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.