Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851149›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Atom-economy upcycling of commodity thermoset polyurethane into photocuring 3D printing resins based on selective cleavage-crosslink strategy.

Yan Huang, Xiaoxiao Guo, Yi Deng, Siyi Ye, Yanling Zhu, Zenghe Liu, Jianwen Chen, Yutian Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yan HuangKey Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Organosilicon Material Technology, College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaoxiao GuoLaboratory for Nanoelectronics and NanoDevices, Department of Electronics Science and Technology, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.
Yi DengKey Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Organosilicon Material Technology, College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Siyi YeKharkiv Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Yanling ZhuKey Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Organosilicon Material Technology, College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Zenghe LiuKey Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Organosilicon Material Technology, College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China. zengheliu@hznu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-3649
Jianwen ChenKey Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Organosilicon Material Technology, College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China. jwchen@hznu.edu.cn.
Yutian ZhuKey Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Organosilicon Material Technology, College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China. ytzhu@hznu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7092-0086

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 52503153Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation) LQ24B040004Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation) LRG25E030003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyurethane waste poses significant environmental challenges due to its large bulk volume and thermoset nature. Current recycling methods suffer from high reagent consumption, urethane byproduct generation, and limited economic value. Here, we well address these issues through a selective cleavage-crosslink strategy using food-grade ethyl acetoacetate (EAA) to break biuret crosslinks while preserving urethane/urea bonds in non-crosslinked regions virtually intact. This strategy minimizes reagent consumption and avoids urethane byproduct. Importantly, the deconstructed product can be fully upcycled to high value-added photocuring 3D printing products with an exceptionally high waste content (up to ~90%) and excellent mechanical properties. Beyond 3D printing, the deconstructed product also holds potential as raw material for adhesives, PU synthesis, and epoxy modifiers. This strategy uses inexpensive commercial reagents and requires no modification to existing polyurethane infrastructure, establishing a commercially implementable pathway for polyurethane waste recycling.

Identifiers

PMID41851149
PMCPMC13153166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.