Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851113›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

White blood cell classification using custom deep neural network and visualizing features of the images using heatmaps.

Sahebgoud Hanamantray Karaddi, Hanumantharao Bitra, Sai Sambasiva Rao Bairaboina, Bharath Reddy Gudibandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sahebgoud Hanamantray KaraddiDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kishkinda University, Ballari, 583120, Karnataka, India.
Hanumantharao BitraSchool of Electronics Engineering, VIT-AP University, Amaravathi, 522237, India. bitrahanumantharao@gmail.com.
Sai Sambasiva Rao BairaboinaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, Deemed to be University, Vijayawada, 520007, India.
Bharath Reddy GudibandiSchool of Electronics Engineering, VIT-AP University, Amaravathi, 522237, India. bharathreddy.gudibandi@vitap.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood count is a key method for diagnosing diseases by analyzing blood cell images using advanced equipment. Traditionally, this process involves invasive techniques and is time-consuming and costly. Modern approaches leverage deep learning (DL) to streamline this process, making it faster and more cost-effective. Given the similarity among blood cell images, distinguishing various blood types by sight is challenging. To address this, we propose a Customized deep neural network (CDNN) to accurately classify different types of blood cells while avoiding overfitting and degradation. CDNN uses a unique DL architecture to classify white blood cells (WBCs). We validated this architecture using the Raabin WBC and BCCD datasets. The model is optimized through preprocessing techniques such as normalization and data augmentation. Simulations were conducted with a batch size of 64, utilizing the Adam optimizer over 50 epochs. Our model achieved a high accuracy of 97.97% on the Raabin dataset and 99.64% on the BCCD dataset, outperforming existing state-of-the-art models. To understand the model's classification process, we applied G-CAM and LIME. These results suggest that CDNN can be developed into clinically useful solutions for detecting WBCs in blood cell images, significantly improving diagnostic efficiency.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLeukocytesNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41851113
PMCPMC13000309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.