ArticleScientific reports2026
White blood cell classification using custom deep neural network and visualizing features of the images using heatmaps.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- XHIC-Net: An Explainable Hybrid Involution-Convolution Network for Blood Smear Cell Morphology Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood count is a key method for diagnosing diseases by analyzing blood cell images using advanced equipment. Traditionally, this process involves invasive techniques and is time-consuming and costly. Modern approaches leverage deep learning (DL) to streamline this process, making it faster and more cost-effective. Given the similarity among blood cell images, distinguishing various blood types by sight is challenging. To address this, we propose a Customized deep neural network (CDNN) to accurately classify different types of blood cells while avoiding overfitting and degradation. CDNN uses a unique DL architecture to classify white blood cells (WBCs). We validated this architecture using the Raabin WBC and BCCD datasets. The model is optimized through preprocessing techniques such as normalization and data augmentation. Simulations were conducted with a batch size of 64, utilizing the Adam optimizer over 50 epochs. Our model achieved a high accuracy of 97.97% on the Raabin dataset and 99.64% on the BCCD dataset, outperforming existing state-of-the-art models. To understand the model's classification process, we applied G-CAM and LIME. These results suggest that CDNN can be developed into clinically useful solutions for detecting WBCs in blood cell images, significantly improving diagnostic efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.