ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026
Long-term vegetation changes in elephant-related areas of concern in Kruger National Park, South Africa.
Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-term vegetation changes in elephant-related areas of concern in Kruger National Park, South Africa.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
African elephants, whether alone or in combination with other environmental factors such as floods, droughts, fire, and other herbivores, have significant impacts on large savanna trees, often contributing to declines over time. However, their effects on woody vegetation in general remain less well understood. To investigate these dynamics in a southern African savanna, we consulted park personnel in Kruger National Park to identify areas where woody cover loss had been observed and where elephants were believed to be the primary driver. Using a Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI)-fusion remote sensing method, we then measured changes in woody cover and height across these areas from 2007 to 2022. Contrary to widespread concerns, GEDI-fusion data did not indicate a general decline in woody cover across the park. In fact, the overall trend shows an increase in woody vegetation. Nonetheless, some localized areas, which were flagged by park staff, showed declines in both general woody cover and large tree height, particularly along perennial rivers and on fertile soils. While we found no overall correlation between woody losses and increases in dry-season elephant densities across the study period, certain areas, especially those along perennial rivers, had the most notable increases in local elephant densities. To better isolate the role of fire, we overlaid woody cover losses with areas that experienced no fire during the study period (2.15% of pixels or ~40,000 ha). Notably, 44% of these fire-free areas overlapped with regions identified by park staff as of concern in terms of elephant-related impacts. While flood events may have contributed to tree losses in fire-free areas where these occur along perennial rivers, the findings collectively indicate that elephants-either independently or in combination with other factors-play a substantial role in the observed declines in woody cover and tree height in these areas. This study highlights the value of combining local knowledge and grassroots insights with advanced remote sensing techniques to detect and interpret spatial patterns of change. It also emphasizes the importance of targeted and adaptive management strategies in high-impact areas to reduce elephant-driven pressure on vulnerable vegetation and to support resilience across the broader landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.