ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2026
Visualization of the Trochlear Nerve Using Deep Learning-enhanced 3D T2-weighted MR Imaging at 3T.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCranial nerve imaging with 3T MRI commonly uses 3D fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (3D-FIESTA); however, this sequence has limitations in achieving higher spatial resolution and provides poor tissue contrast between cranial nerves and adjacent vascular structures. We evaluated 3D T2-weighted imaging (T2-CUBE) with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for cranial nerve visualization, focusing on the trochlear nerve, the smallest cranial nerve with the longest intracranial course, and compared it with T2-CUBE without DLR and 3D-FIESTA.
methodsTen healthy male volunteers (age, 23-40 years; mean age, 32 years) underwent T2-CUBE with and without DLR, and 3D-FIESTA at 3T. Two neuroradiologists independently evaluated trochlear nerve visualization in 4 anatomical segments (origin from the midbrain, cisternal, tentorial, and anterior portion of its cavernous segments) using a 3-point scale, and SNR of the pons (SNR
resultsT2-CUBE with DLR achieved a 100% visualization across all trochlear nerve segments and demonstrated significantly better visualization than both T2-CUBE without DLR and 3D-FIESTA (P < 0.025). T2-CUBE without DLR showed 67.5%-100% visualization across the 4 segments. 3D-FIESTA showed 32.5%-80% visualization of the origin from the midbrain, cisternal, and tentorial segments, with no visualization of the cavernous segments. DLR increased SNR
conclusionT2-CUBE with DLR at 3T provided a significantly better trochlear nerve visualization than T2-CUBE without DLR and 3D-FIESTA. This technique may extend beyond the trochlear nerve to other cranial nerves and to the evaluation of neurovascular compression in the cistern, with the potential to become the new standard for cisternal imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.