Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41850820›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2026

Visualization of the Trochlear Nerve Using Deep Learning-enhanced 3D T2-weighted MR Imaging at 3T.

Taiki Koshiishi, Satoru Ide, Yuka Ishimoto, Tomohiro Shintaku, Sera Kasai, Jusei Kudo, Keita Watanabe, Tetsuya Wakayama, Atsushi Nozaki, Xucheng Zhu and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Taiki KoshiishiDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.
Satoru IdeDepartment of Radiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6567-6736
Yuka IshimotoDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.
Tomohiro ShintakuDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.
Sera KasaiDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.
Jusei KudoDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.
Keita WatanabeDepartment of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Tetsuya WakayamaGE HealthCare, Hino, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi NozakiGE HealthCare, Hino, Tokyo, Japan.
Xucheng ZhuGE HealthCare, Menlo Park CA, USA.
Kana SaitoDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.
Mizuki ImuraDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.
Amo OzawaDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.
Shuichi MatsuhashiDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.
Tatsuro SasakiDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.
Saaya MoriDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.
Masashi MatsuzakaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Hirosaki University Hospital, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.
Shingo KakedaDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki Aomori, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCranial nerve imaging with 3T MRI commonly uses 3D fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (3D-FIESTA); however, this sequence has limitations in achieving higher spatial resolution and provides poor tissue contrast between cranial nerves and adjacent vascular structures. We evaluated 3D T2-weighted imaging (T2-CUBE) with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for cranial nerve visualization, focusing on the trochlear nerve, the smallest cranial nerve with the longest intracranial course, and compared it with T2-CUBE without DLR and 3D-FIESTA.

methodsTen healthy male volunteers (age, 23-40 years; mean age, 32 years) underwent T2-CUBE with and without DLR, and 3D-FIESTA at 3T. Two neuroradiologists independently evaluated trochlear nerve visualization in 4 anatomical segments (origin from the midbrain, cisternal, tentorial, and anterior portion of its cavernous segments) using a 3-point scale, and SNR of the pons (SNR

resultsT2-CUBE with DLR achieved a 100% visualization across all trochlear nerve segments and demonstrated significantly better visualization than both T2-CUBE without DLR and 3D-FIESTA (P < 0.025). T2-CUBE without DLR showed 67.5%-100% visualization across the 4 segments. 3D-FIESTA showed 32.5%-80% visualization of the origin from the midbrain, cisternal, and tentorial segments, with no visualization of the cavernous segments. DLR increased SNR

conclusionT2-CUBE with DLR at 3T provided a significantly better trochlear nerve visualization than T2-CUBE without DLR and 3D-FIESTA. This technique may extend beyond the trochlear nerve to other cranial nerves and to the evaluation of neurovascular compression in the cistern, with the potential to become the new standard for cisternal imaging.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingTrochlear NerveAdultHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleYoung Adult3D T2-weighted imagingAIR Recon DLCUBE sequencemagnetic resonance imagingtrochlear nerve

Identifiers

PMID41850820
PMCPMC13485384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.