Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41850750›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026

Total body irradiation (TBI) combining volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for thorax at standard source axis distance (SAD) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) at extended SAD.

Marc Delaperrière, Markus Hirt, Christian Felix Schulz, Frank André Siebert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marc DelaperrièreDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, UKSH), Kiel, Germany.
Markus HirtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, UKSH), Kiel, Germany.
Christian Felix SchulzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, UKSH), Kiel, Germany.
Frank André SiebertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, UKSH), Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTotal body irradiation (TBI) is an important part of conditioning regimens prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). At our institution, a conventional TBI technique employing bilateral fields at extended source-to-axis distance (eSAD) and a solid three-dimensional (3D) compensator has been standard practice since the 80s. However, its ability to minimize lung dose remains limited.

aimsThis study aims to modernize the existing TBI technique using the capabilities of our treatment planning system (TPS). The proposed hybrid method replaces solid compensators with virtual compensation by combining bilateral intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) fields at eSAD of 500 cm with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) fields at standard SAD 100 cm for the thoracic region.

methodsAt first, the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) V16 and AcurosXB (AXB) V16 dose calculation algorithms of the Eclipse TPS (Varian) were commissioned for use at eSAD. Dosimetric measurements were performed in water, solid water, and inhomogeneous phantoms. Subsequently, a treatment planning strategy was developed to minimize the influence of positioning uncertainties on lung dose. Anonymized computed tomography (CT) datasets representing diverse patient anatomies were utilized for treatment planning evaluation. Final validation was conducted through an end-to-end test using an anthropomorphic phantom. SAD VMAT and eSAD IMRT fields were verified using a two-dimensional (2D) dosimetry chamber array positioned at both caudal and cranial thoracic levels under SAD and eSAD setups. The resulting cumulative dose was then compared with the AXB-calculated dose.

resultsAt eSAD, mean measured-calculated dose deviations were < 2% for AXB and < 4% for AAA, with confidence limits of 3.5% and 5%, respectively. These results affirmed the clinical viability of both algorithms, with AXB providing superior dose calculation accuracy. Planning studies showed consistent PTV coverage with lung dose reduction across diverse anatomies, and end-to-end phantom validation confirmed the workflow practicability. Verification of summed dose using the 2D array, with 95% of evaluated points meeting a gamma criterion of 5 mm and 5%, provided additional confidence in the dosimetric robustness of the treatment concept.

conclusionThis study showed the feasibility of a novel hybrid eSAD IMRT/VMAT TBI technique providing a clinically viable approach enabling effective lung dose sparing while maintaining the robustness of large-field irradiation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsOrgans at RiskPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedThoraxWhole-Body IrradiationHumansRadiotherapy Dosagebilateral TBIeSADhybrid TBIIMRT TBITBItotal body irradiation

Identifiers

PMID41850750
PMCPMC13093430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.