ArticleJournal of bone metabolism2026
Mapping a Decade of Osteoporosis and Fracture Research: A Bibliometric Analysis (2015-2025).
Article in Journal of bone metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOsteoporosis is a major global health concern, affecting over 200 million individuals worldwide. Although numerous clinical and experimental studies exist, comprehensive analyses integrating fracture-related and drug-specific research remain limited. Examining global research trends can highlight evolving themes, key contributors, and areas requiring scientific attention.
methodsWe performed a bibliometric analysis of literature on osteoporosis and fractures, including drug-specific terms (denosumab, romosozumab, teriparatide), published between 2015 and 2025 in the Scopus Core Collection. Data were assessed for publication trends, authorship, institutional output, international collaboration, and thematic evolution using Bibliometrix-Biblioshiny in RStudio. Network analyses included co-authorship and keyword co-occurrence mapping for both quantitative and qualitative insights.
resultsFrom 4,450 articles, annual output showed steady growth, peaking between 2021 and 2024. The United States, Japan, and China led in publication volume and citation impact, while Osteoporosis International was the most productive journal. Citation averages declined recently due to lag in newer publications. Thematic mapping identified pharmacological therapies such as denosumab and teriparatide as core themes, while "fracture prevention" and "DXA-based assessment" emerged as active research fronts. International collaboration decreased after 2020, particularly affecting contributions from low- and middle-income countries.
conclusionsGlobal osteoporosis research demonstrates sustained productivity but declining collaboration and limited thematic diversification. Strengthening international networks, supporting underrepresented regions, and expanding focus to preventive and non-pharmacological strategies are essential for equitable and impactful progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.