Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41850255›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry investigation2026

Meta-Analysis of Anxiety Symptoms and Influencing Factors Among Chinese College Students.

Jiami Wu, Jiayi Gu, Dadong Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiami WuZhejiang Institute of Economics and Trade, Hangzhou, China.
Jiayi GuNeurology Department, Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Dadong GuNeurology Department, Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhuji, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the influencing factors on anxiety symptoms among Chinese college students and provide a reference for the prevention and treatment of mental disorders in this population.

methodsThe PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP databases were searched electronically for published studies on anxiety symptoms among Chinese college students. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software after extracting the relevant data. A random-effects meta-analysis was applied.

resultsTwenty articles were included, with a total sample size of 34,672 participants and a detection rate of 23.46% for anxiety symptoms. The results revealed that graduation status (I²=84%, odds ratio [OR]=1.52, p=0.020), professional satisfaction (I²=0%, OR=0.55, p<0.001), only-child status (I²=0%, OR=1.25, p=0.007), family structure (I²=63%, OR=2.41, p<0.001), left-behind experience (I²=80%, OR=2.05, p<0.001), personality characteristics (I²=29%, OR=1.45, p<0.001), and drinking habits (I²=0%, OR=2.05, p=0.040) were substantial influencing factors in college students' anxiety. Substantial between-study heterogeneity was observed for several factors (e.g., graduation status, I²=84%), suggesting contextual differences across campuses. Accordingly, we interpreted the pooled effects alongside heterogeneity metrics and sensitivity analyses to aid readability.

conclusionChinese college students exhibit a high detection rate of anxiety symptoms. Students nearing graduation, those dissatisfied with their major, only children, those from incomplete family structures, and those with left-behind experience, introverted personalities or drinking habits may be more prone to developing anxiety symptoms.

Indexed as

AnxietyCollege studentsInfluencing factorsMeta-analysis.

Identifiers

PMID41850255
PMCPMC12999238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.