ArticleCell reports. Medicine2026
Developing and evaluating multimodal large language model for orthopantomography analysis to support clinical dentistry.
Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Algorithmic Performance to Clinical Translation: Translational Readiness of Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry-A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthopantomography (OPG) is a primary screening tool for initial dental diagnosis, yet existing AI support typically operates in a one-way manner, lacking interactive nature like ChatGPT. To address this, we introduce ToothXpert, a dental diagnostic system with multimodal large language model. We curated a dental concept alignment dataset and a comprehensive multimodal OPG dataset, MM-OPG (comprising 131,065 question-answer [QA] pairs), covering 11 key conditions. ToothXpert facilitates simultaneous visual and language responses, fostering dynamic dentistry support. On the internal test dataset with 4,950 QA pairs, ToothXpert achieves a macro F1 score of 78.61%, outperforming LLaVA v.1.5 by 23.19%, LLaVA-Med v.1.5 by 41.39%, Qwen-VL by 56.38%, and HuatuoGPT-Vision by 26.74%. In human assessment, ToothXpert achieves an averaged performance of 3.54, surpassing compared multimodal large language models (MLLMs) with 1.46 and 1.38. Moreover, on the external dataset, ToothXpert achieves 1.96% and 2.99% higher F1 scores than two junior dentists with 3-years' clinical experience, while requiring significantly less time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.