Trial reportESMO open2026
Phase III trial of infigratinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in adults with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusion or rearrangement: results and reflections on early termination of PROOF 301.
Trial report in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pemigatinib for Unresectable or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma With Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-2 Rearrangement: Results From the Phase III FIGHT-302 Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Trial
- Molecular biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, precision therapy, and immunotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma, cHCC-CCA, and HCC.Hepatology communications · 2026Review
- Precision oncology needs precision trial design: lessons from FGFR2-rearranged cholangiocarcinoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Medicinal chemistry perspectives on anticancer drug design based on clinical applications (2015-2025).RSC advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfigratinib, an oral fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 inhibitor, showed clinical activity and manageable adverse events in the P2 CBGJ398X2204 study and was conditionally approved for adults with previously treated, unresectable, or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangement. PROOF 301, reported in this article, is the confirmatory phase III trial of infigratinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line treatment of FGFR2-rearranged CCA. PATIENTS AND
methodsEligible adult patients were randomly assigned in a 2 : 1 ratio to infigratinib 125 mg on days 1-21 of a 28-day treatment cycle versus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m
resultsOver 40 months, 1127 patients were pre-screened at 120 sites, and 48 patients were randomly allocated to the study in a 2 : 1 ratio (29 to infigratinib, 19 to chemotherapy). With a target accrual of ∼300 patients, this study was terminated early due to poor accrual. Median PFS (95% confidence interval) by blinded independent central review (BICR) was 7.4 and 8.0 months with infigratinib and chemotherapy, respectively. The ORRs by BICR were 37.9% with infigratinib and 15.8% with chemotherapy. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 79.3% and 58.8% patients treated with infigratinib and chemotherapy, respectively.
conclusionEarly termination limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions on the efficacy of infigratinib as first-line treatment of FGFR2-rearranged CCA. This study illustrates the challenges of powering confirmatory studies in biomarker-selected subpopulations of rare tumors and highlights the need for regulatory collaboration to develop pragmatic frameworks for assessing novel therapies in ultra-rare malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.