Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41850007›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2026

Modification of RECIST 1.1 criteria for assessing response in breast tumours treated with radiation therapy using multiparametric breast MRI: Radiology and oncology perspective.

E Durie, M Morris, N A Healy, S Salehi-Bird, A Seth, P Haria, N Tunariu, S Allen, Aditi Chandra, Shalini Sahu and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

E DurieDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.
M MorrisDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, UK.
N A HealyDepartment of Radiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Breast Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
S Salehi-BirdUniversity Hospitals North Midlands, Stoke, UK.
A SethNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
P HariaTata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
N TunariuThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.
S AllenThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.
Aditi ChandraTata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India.
Shalini SahuChristian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Rakesh AnandarajanRegional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, India.
Miklos BartaRoyal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.
Ioannis RoxanisThe Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
F H CaffertyClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
M D BlackledgeDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
N SomaiahDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK. Electronic address: navita.somaiah@icr.ac.uk.
KORTUC phase II trial management group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The traditional, size-based, RECIST 1.1 guideline is the standard for assessing tumour response, but has notable limitations, particularly for breast tumours treated with radiotherapy (RT). RT often induces fibrosis, leading to a persisting measurable abnormality on T1W/T2W MRI sequences despite an underlying pathological response. As pre-operative RT trials expand and omission of surgery is being tested, having anatomico-functional MRI response criteria may facilitate more accurate response evaluation. We propose modified RECIST 1.1 criteria based on 3 sequences of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI): unenhanced T2W, contrast-enhanced (CE) T1W and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Key recommendations include complete response defined as 1) resolution of tumour mass on all sequences, or 2) evidence of residual T2 abnormality with CE images showing no enhancement above background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and DWI signal consistent with necrosis/fibrosis, or 3) minimal evidence of enhancement above BPE with DWI in keeping with fibrosis. Criteria are also defined for other response categories (partial response/stable disease/progression). These recommendations can be tested in future trials and offer guidance on the interpretation of mpMRI sequences when breast tumours are treated in situ with radiation, a scenario in which little published data currently exists. They highlight how DWI can aid RT response assessment and help overcome some limitations with current RECIST criteria.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsContrast MediaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeContrast MediaMRI response assessmentMultiparametric MRIPrimary breast radiotherapyRadiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID41850007
PMCPMC13014914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.