Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41849656›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Tissue-specific DNA repair strategies underlie apparent high transposon activity in the Caenorhabditis elegans soma.

Cindy Chang, David D Lowe, Scott Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cindy ChangDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4905-4424
David D LoweDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Scott KennedyDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7974-8155

Funding

Non-Coding RNAs in Gene Regulation, Genome Defense, and Epigenetic InheritanceR35GM148206 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Scott G Kennedy · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148206NIH HHS R35GM148206US government
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposons are parasitic nucleic acids that threaten genome integrity in all organisms. DNA transposons mobilize via a cut-and-paste mechanism, which leads to double-strand breaks (DSBs). In Caenorhabditis elegans, DNA transposons are mobile in the soma, where their excision rates are reportedly ≅1,000-fold higher than in germ cells. How or why DNA transposons might be highly active in the C. elegans soma is a mystery. Here, we show that the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway is responsible for generating >99.9% of the empty transposon sites accruing in the C. elegans soma. C. elegans uses homologous recombination (HR) to repair transposon-induced DSBs in its germline. Because HR, but not NHEJ, restores excised transposons back into their original chromosomal position during repair, we propose that the apparent elevated activity of DNA transposons in the C. elegans soma can, in large part, be explained by tissue-specific differences in DNA repair strategy.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansDNA End-Joining RepairDNA RepairDNA Transposable ElementsAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedHomologous RecombinationOrgan SpecificityCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDNA Transposable ElementsCaenorhabditis elegansDNA repairdouble-strand breakNHEJtransposon

Identifiers

PMID41849656
PMCPMC13148408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.