Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41849636›Full record

ArticleKidney & blood pressure research2026

Detection of Nondiabetic Kidney Disease in Patients with Diabetes Using Machine Learning and Electronic Medical Record Data.

Zhongyu Liu, Chunyang Li, Jia Yao, Zhiye Ying, Ling Li, Ping Fu, Xiaoxi Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney & blood pressure research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhongyu LiuDivision of Nephrology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chunyang LiDivision of Nephrology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jia YaoDivision of Nephrology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhiye YingDivision of Nephrology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ling LiDivision of Nephrology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, echoliling@wchscu.cn.
Ping FuDivision of Nephrology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoxi ZengDivision of Nephrology and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, zengxiaoxi@wchscu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe identification of nondiabetic kidney disease (NDKD) in diabetic patients is critically important. Unlike diabetic nephropathy, NDKD often requires additional therapeutic interventions beyond standard diabetes care. There is a need to develop computational methods using electronic medical record data to identify NDKD in diabetic patients for whom kidney biopsy is not an option.

methodsThe study included 1,136 diabetic patients who underwent kidney biopsy at a tertiary teaching hospital. We collected 103 parameters from electronic medical records, including demographic characteristics, physical examination results, laboratory tests, and the status of diabetic retinopathy. We developed seven models to detect NDKD, including k nearest neighbors, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGB), LASSO logistic regression, support vector machine, naïve Bayes, and multilayer perceptron (MLP), in the training set (n = 908) and compared their performances in the testing set (n = 228). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach was used to analyze the importance of features.

resultsBiopsy-confirmed NDKD was present in 53% of the 1,136 participants. In the testing set, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for NDKD detection using XGB, LASSO regression, and MLP reached 0.8, with performances that were stable regardless of whether variable normalization was performed. Among them, XGB revealed the highest AUC (0.833; 95% CI: 0.800-0.864) without feature normalization, which was statistically superior to the other models according to DeLong's tests. After feature normalization, SVM achieved the highest AUC of 0.841 (95% CI: 0.817-0.861) among all models. In addition to established predictive factors for NDKD (e.g., hematuria and absence of diabetic retinopathy), SHAP analysis identified several features, such as low IgG levels, that contributed significantly to the differentiation models.

conclusionDespite performance variations in different modeling techniques, machine learning models may have the potential to facilitate the detection of NDKD for patients with contraindications for kidney biopsy. Further efforts are warranted to improve accuracy and facilitate their translation into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusElectronic Health RecordsKidney DiseasesMachine LearningAgedBiopsyBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsDiabetic nephropathyElectronic medical recordsMachine learningNondiabetic kidney disease

Identifiers

PMID41849636
PMCPMC13249416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.