ArticleRevista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology2026
Care and primary health care access indicators among Brazilian adults with diabetes mellitus, National Health Survey 2019.
Article in Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze indicators of access to health services and care among adults with Diabetes mellitus in Brazil, according to Primary Health Care coverage.
methodsA cross-sectional study using data from the 2019 National Health Survey (PNS). Only individuals who self-reported a diagnosis of Diabetes mellitus were selected. Explanatory variables represented indicators of care and access among adults with a Diabetes mellitus diagnosis. Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated for the indicators. The association with registration in a Family Health Unit was verified by bivariate analysis. Indicators with p≤0.05 were included in a logistic regression model and, subsequently, in a model adjusted for sex and age.
resultsAmong the Brazilian adult population, 8.2% (95%CI 7.9-8.6) self-reported a diagnosis of Diabetes mellitus. After adjustment, individuals with diabetes living in households registered in a Family Health Unit were more likely to have had their last consultation in a Primary Health Care Unit (OR=2.13; 95%CI 1.71-2.64), to have been seen by a specialist physician after referral (OR=1.97; 95%CI 1.49-2.60), and to report severe limitations in usual activities due to the condition (OR=1.65; 95%CI 1.05-2.62). On the other hand, they were less likely to have been seen by the same doctor as in previous consultations (OR=0.65; 95%CI 0.53-0.81) and to have undergone an eye exam in the past year (OR=0.73; 95%CI 0.58-0.90).
conclusionDisparities exist in care and access to Primary Health Care services among Brazilian adults with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.