ArticleEpidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil2026
Surveillance of public water supply fluoridation from the perspective of municipal health department technicians: a cross-sectional study, Goiás, 2022-2023.
Article in Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate public water supply fluoridation surveillance actions in Goiás from the perspective of municipal health department technicians.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with technicians responsible for water quality surveillance in each municipality of Goiás with fluoridated water. The final sample comprised 169 participants who completed an electronic questionnaire between 2022 and 2023. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
resultsMore than half had completed higher education (56.8%) and held permanent positions (58.6%). Most reported knowing the Ministry of Health regulations, either fully or partially (95.3%), and considered fluoride analysis very important or important (87.8%). Less than half (42.6%) rated their level of training as very good or good, and 56.8% knew the purpose of fluoride. Analysis of this parameter was carried out by 26 municipalities (15.4%), of which 65.4% entered data into the Water Quality Surveillance Information System for Human Consumption (Sisagua). The most frequent reasons for not performing fluoridation surveillance were the lack of requests from the State Health Department (36.1%), materials and equipment (36.1%), knowledge (27.8%), and trained professionals (22.5%).
conclusionFluoridation surveillance actions were not systematically carried out by most technicians in the surveyed municipalities. Several difficulties and weaknesses were identified, indicating the need for actions to support compliance with the national policy on water surveillance for human consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.