Observational studyArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2026
Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Very Small-Caliber Vessels: Analysis of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent and Other Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents.
Observational study in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Small Vessels, Big Decisions.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in very small-caliber vessels (≤2.25 mm) presents technical challenges and is associated with poorer outcomes compared to larger vessels. The Inspiron® stent, a drug-eluting stent (DES) manufactured in Brazil, has been evaluated in multiple studies; however, data on its performance in vessels smaller than 2.5 mm are lacking.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of PCI using DES in very small-caliber vessels and to compare the Inspiron® stent with other contemporary DES platforms. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization.
methodsWe conducted an observational study including a consecutive sample at a Brazilian reference center from 2017 to 2021. Outcomes were assessed in-hospital, at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months, using a 5% threshold for statistical significance.
resultsA total of 783 DES were implanted: 47% Inspiron® and 46.8% other DES. The mean patient age was 64.7 ± 11 years; 61% were male, and 42% had diabetes mellitus. At 12 months, the overall MACE rate was 4.54% (36/793), with no difference between groups (Inspiron®: 4.6% vs. other DES: 4.6%; p=1.000). Individual endpoints and stent thrombosis rates were also similar (4 [1.0%] vs. 2 [0.5%]; p=0.868).
conclusionour findings show that the Inspiron® stent has acceptable safety and efficacy and provides comparable 12-month clinical outcomes to other contemporary DES in very small-caliber coronary vessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.