ArticlePloS one2026
A GeoAI framework for detecting risk zones from illegal dumping sites in Khulna, Bangladesh.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Illegal dumping is a major challenge of municipal solid waste management. A significant portion of waste is dumped illegally in cities worldwide. This improper waste disposal creates serious ecological degradation, environmental hazards, public health risks, and urban planning challenges. This study presents a Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning framework for detecting illegal dumping sites using GeoAI. Seven machine learning algorithms were trained on 70% of 341 confirmed illegal dumping sites across 10 m × 10 m resolution grids covering Khulna City Corporation, Bangladesh. The remaining 30% of the data was reserved for independent testing. The best model was selected using a weighted composite score combining the Area Under the Curve (AUC) and F1 score from spatial cross-validation, and the selected best model was subsequently evaluated on an independent hold-out test set. Random Forest achieved the highest AUC (0.883) and F1 score (0.820), and consistently outperformed other models across all weighting schemes. The three most influential predictors of illegal dumping were proximity to roads, drains, and buildings. The predicted risk map shows that the very high and high-risk zones are concentrated along roads and urban centers. This study introduces the first GeoAI framework for illegal dumping site detection in Khulna, Bangladesh. This framework can also be applied in other cities to detect illegal dumping sites at the community level. This methodology can help municipal authorities to develop a waste management plan that addresses both illegal dumping challenges and long-term infrastructure planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.