ArticlePloS one2026
Prevalence of generative artificial intelligence sexualized image usage by adolescents in the United States.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Generative Artificial Intelligence Use and Adolescent Mental Health.Current pediatrics reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) usage related to sexualized images amongst adolescents is a critical emerging research area. In this exploratory study, a nationally representative online survey of 557 English-speaking individuals aged 13-17 was conducted. Participants were asked about their consensual and non-consensual usage and interactions with sexualized GenAI images. The survey included questions on images created with nudification software as well as content creation software, and asked participants about their creation, sharing, and viewing of this content, as well as that of their peers. Use of nudification tools was widespread, with 55.3% (n = 308) of participants reporting having created and 54.4% (n = 303) having received at least one image. Reported victimization levels of participants was substantial, with 36.3% (n = 202) of individuals reporting having a non-consensual image created and 33.2% (n = 185) of individuals having had at least one image non-consensually shared. Usage was similar across demographic categories, though male participants had higher degrees of regular GenAI sexual image creation and distribution, both consensual and non-consensual. Policymakers need to consider the extensive usage and its normalization and consider educational interventions, and practitioners need to be aware of the high degree and nature of victimization occurring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.