Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41849316›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

When revealed after the fact, selfish intentions undermine prosocial actions in 5-year-olds.

Kayley Dotson, Michael Tomasello

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kayley DotsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3086-3806
Michael TomaselloMax Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early in ontogeny, children show a preference for prosocial others and for those with helpful intentions. Here, we investigate how children reason about prosocial actions when a selfish intention is revealed only after a prosocial behavior has benefitted them. 5-year-old children (N = 48) played a game with a puppet who acted prosocially by letting the child take a turn in a game. After the game, the puppet revealed either a selfish intention of getting a cookie for letting the child play (Undermining condition) or a prosocial intention of wanting the child to have fun (Prosocial condition). When given a chance to reciprocate a prosocial act, children shared less when the puppet had an Undermining versus a Prosocial intention. Children did not show any condition differences in their explicit social evaluations of the puppet, however. Our results indicate that an agent's initially hidden selfish intention, revealed only after a prosocial action, negatively impacts a child's willingness to later reciprocate with that agent.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorIntentionSocial BehaviorChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID41849316
PMCPMC12998847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.