Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41849304›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

ABC-YOLO: Automated skin burn depth classification using YOLO architectures.

Uğur Şevik, Onur Mutlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Uğur ŞevikDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2056-9988
Onur MutluDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6204-5535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of skin burn depth is vital for determining appropriate treatment and accelerating the healing process. This study conducts a comparative analysis of YOLO-based deep learning architectures for the automated classification of skin burns. Analyses were performed on a robust, multi-source dataset created by combining a proprietary collection of 358 retrospective images from Karadeniz Technical University Farabi Hospital with two large public datasets from Roboflow Universe and Kaggle. All images were meticulously labeled into four burn degrees by expert general surgeons. To enhance model performance and generalizability, various data augmentation and preprocessing techniques were applied. Segmentation-based versions of YOLOv8 and YOLOv11 with different architectural sizes (medium, large, extra-large) were evaluated using metrics such as precision, recall, F1-Score, and mAP. The findings revealed that the YOLOv11x-seg model demonstrated marked superiority over all other tested architectures, achieving an F1-Score of 0.87 and a mAP@0.5 of 0.91. Statistical analysis confirmed the significance of these results. The study demonstrates that the YOLOv11x-seg architecture offers significant potential as a rapid and objective decision support tool in clinical settings. This work makes an original contribution to improving burn diagnosis by integrating a state-of-the-art deep learning model into medical image analysis.

Indexed as

BurnsDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSkinHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41849304
PMCPMC12998836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.