ArticlePloS one2026
ABC-YOLO: Automated skin burn depth classification using YOLO architectures.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reliable Detection, Unreliable Clinical Decision-making: Artificial Intelligence Models in Burn Assessment.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate classification of skin burn depth is vital for determining appropriate treatment and accelerating the healing process. This study conducts a comparative analysis of YOLO-based deep learning architectures for the automated classification of skin burns. Analyses were performed on a robust, multi-source dataset created by combining a proprietary collection of 358 retrospective images from Karadeniz Technical University Farabi Hospital with two large public datasets from Roboflow Universe and Kaggle. All images were meticulously labeled into four burn degrees by expert general surgeons. To enhance model performance and generalizability, various data augmentation and preprocessing techniques were applied. Segmentation-based versions of YOLOv8 and YOLOv11 with different architectural sizes (medium, large, extra-large) were evaluated using metrics such as precision, recall, F1-Score, and mAP. The findings revealed that the YOLOv11x-seg model demonstrated marked superiority over all other tested architectures, achieving an F1-Score of 0.87 and a mAP@0.5 of 0.91. Statistical analysis confirmed the significance of these results. The study demonstrates that the YOLOv11x-seg architecture offers significant potential as a rapid and objective decision support tool in clinical settings. This work makes an original contribution to improving burn diagnosis by integrating a state-of-the-art deep learning model into medical image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.