Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41849283›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

How do hospital goals resonate with leaders, clinicians, managers, and patient and family partners? A critical discourse analysis of institutional logics.

Umair Majid, Kerry Kuluski, Pia Kontos, Carolyn Steele Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Umair MajidInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4581-7714
Kerry KuluskiInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Pia KontosKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Carolyn Steele GrayInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn pursuit of building person-centered health systems, patient and family engagement (PE) has emerged as a strategy to promote care quality, well-being, and patient experience in hospitals. Institutional logics suggests that institutions are guided by dominant belief systems referred to as logics that represent the fundamental narratives that shape an organization's ethos, decision-making processes and behaviors. In healthcare, four logics have been identified: public management (i.e., community health and well-being), market (i.e., efficiency and cost containment), medical professional (i.e., care quality), and care professional (i.e., patient well-being). The objective of this research was to explore what hospital documents reveal about the hospital's goals for PE and how staff and patient and family partners understand and describe such goals.

methodsThis study employed critical discourse analysis of organizational documents and interviews with 25 participants representing diverse roles (patient and family partners, clinicians, managers, and executives) in one hospital system.

resultsThis study found a strong emphasis on the medical and care professional logics in organizational documents and 25 participant interviews: nine managers and directors, nine clinicians, five patient and family partners and two executive leaders. Managers and clinicians understood and described the hospital's PE goals in the context of their institutional roles and responsibilities, such as improving patient satisfaction, using clinical tools, and designing new programs. There was also a shared emphasis on the care professional logic in all participant groups and in multiple organizational documents by articulating patients as the primary focus of hospital goals. There was some indication of the public management logic, primarily by executives and directors in their goals to engage communities and somewhat by clinicians and managers in their discussion on equity, diversity, and inclusivity initiatives at the hospital. Finally, there were two mentions of the market logic, one in a single organizational document and by two managers, which referred to the sustainability of health services.

conclusionsThis study explored what hospital documents convey about goals for PE and how participants understand and describe such goals. Future research on how hospital goals are practiced could provide the data to determine the role of market logic in operationalizing hospital goals.

Indexed as

GoalsHospitalsLeadershipOrganizational ObjectivesFamilyHumansPatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID41849283
PMCPMC12998869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.