ArticleMilitary medicine2026
Accurate Shoulder Angles Can Be Detected in Single Plane Motions While Body Armor is Worn: A Validation of the HumanTrak Markerless Motion Capture System.
Article in Military medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMeasuring shoulder mobility is essential for assessing function, especially in occupational settings like the military, where movement tasks in the frontal and sagittal planes are involved. Markerless motion capture systems like the HumanTrak may provide an expedient field platform to quantify upper body kinematics in occupational settings because of their portability. Further validation of these systems against established methodologies, such as marker-based motion capture, is required before upscaling their use. MATERIALS AND
methodsSeventeen participants (7 males and 10 females; age, 25 ± 7 years; stature, 1.70 ± 0.08 m; mass, 72.26 ± 15.09 kg) completed standardized fixed-range shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction tasks with and without body armor for 3 systems: HumanTrak, 2D video capture, and 3D marker-based motion capture. Joint angles were calculated using planar and Euler algorithms. The HumanTrak's relative and absolute validity was compared against these established methodologies.
resultsGenerally, valid relative and absolute results were found, with Pearson correlations (r) ranging from 0.56 to 0.93 and root mean square errors ranging from 2.51° to 7.35° for shoulder flexion, extension, and abduction with and without body armor. Shoulder adduction measures were generally invalid, as r values ranged from -0.24 to 0.77, and with root mean square errors ranging from 5.27° to 8.42°.
conclusionsThe HumanTrak's validity is comparable to that of existing field expedient markerless motion capture systems in estimating shoulder joint angles in abduction and the sagittal plane. When movements are standardized to a singular plane of motion and a neutral spine is assumed, valid results can be measured for shoulder flexion, extension, and abduction with and without body armor. Shoulder adduction was generally invalid for both body armor and no body armor conditions, likely because of its multi-planar nature and axial trunk rotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.