ArticleJMIR AI2026
Perspectives on How Sociology Can Advance Theorizing About Human-Chatbot Interaction and Developing Chatbots for Social Good.
Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: Recently, research into chatbots (also known as conversational agents, artificial intelligence agents, or voice assistants), which are computer applications using artificial intelligence to mimic human-like conversation, has grown sharply. Despite this growth, sociology lags behind other disciplines (including computer science, medicine, psychology, and communication) in publishing about chatbots. We suggest sociology can advance the understanding of human-chatbot interaction and offer 4 sociological theories to enhance extant work in this field. The first 2 theories (resource substitution theory and power-dependence theory) add new insights to existing models of the drivers of chatbot use, which overlook sociological concerns about how social structure (eg, systemic discrimination and the uneven distribution of resources within networks) inclines individuals to use chatbots, including problematic levels of emotional dependency on chatbots. The second 2 theories (affect control theory and fundamental cause of disease theory) help inform the development of chatbot-driven interventions that minimize safety risks by integrating a sociologically informed normative framework (eg, affective norms) into chatbot alignment and enhance equity by enhancing access to community resources (eg, opportunities for civic participation). We discuss how the theories advance theorizing about human-chatbot interaction and developing chatbots for social good, which are chatbots that provide scalable solutions to social and environmental challenges facing humanity while supporting human agency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.