ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Disparities in Access to Gastrointestinal Care in the United States.
Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Racial, Ethnic, and Immigration-Related Disparities Across the Gastrointestinal Care Continuum: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disparities in gastrointestinal (GI) care in the United States represent a major health burden, with GI diseases accounting for approximately $135 billion annually in direct medical expenditures. A pronounced geographic disparity exists, with over two-thirds of the 3,149 U.S. counties lacking any GI specialist. This results in an estimated 49-50 million Americans required to travel more than 25 miles for specialty care. For instance, states like Wyoming and Arizona report over 75% of residents are more than 25 miles from GI care, while states such as Alaska and North Dakota average only 1.8 gastroenterologists per 100,000 population. Socioeconomic inequities manifest as tangible deficits in care: a lack of insurance is associated with a 15-20% point gap in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake. For hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, initiation within one year of diagnosis was 35% for privately insured patients but only 23% for Medicaid patients. In acute emergencies, uninsured patients face higher mortality in both upper GI bleeding (UGIB) and lower GI bleeding (LGIB). Targeted interventions show promise in mitigation: community health worker (CHW)-led programs have been shown to significantly increase CRC screening uptake. Patient navigation, often combined with mailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), has increased CRC screening completion by 7.3% points in safety-net populations. Telemedicine models can expand access, with video-based IBD care management programs requiring in-person evaluations in only ~ 1.3% of cases. Policy reforms, such as removing restrictive state Medicaid criteria for HCV therapy, have been shown to significantly increase treatment and narrow disparities. Continued focus on workforce incentives and data transparency remains critical to address these persistent, structurally rooted gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.