ArticleHealth economics review2026
Developing shortcut algorithms for value-based pricing of pharmaceuticals.
Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Value-based pricing (VBP) involves regulating the reimbursement or pricing of pharmaceuticals based on their therapeutic value. We adopt VBP as the policy context for this study. Unlike alternative approaches, VBP depends on an explicit relationship between price and incremental health outcomes and costs. This dependence makes VBP decisions especially sensitive to uncertainty about downstream costs and outcomes. A central question is whether—and how far—these components must be modeled beyond the trial period. A key gap is that the literature provides limited, generalizable conditions for when extrapolation is necessary for pricing conclusions versus when trial-period evidence is sufficient. This paper demonstrates the conditions under which it is possible to forgo modeling downstream costs beyond the clinical trial period for VBP purposes. It provides a series of specific mathematical proofs to support this approach. The proposed shortcuts reduce the burden and time required to produce evaluations. Furthermore, the shortcuts validate the robustness of decision models by allowing modelers to test whether applying these assumptions yields consistent results, enhancing the reliability of VBP methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.