Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41849120›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2026

Developing shortcut algorithms for value-based pricing of pharmaceuticals.

Afschin Gandjour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Afschin GandjourFrankfurt School of Finance & Management, Adickesallee 32-34, Frankfurt am Main, 60322, Germany. a.gandjour@fs.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Value-based pricing (VBP) involves regulating the reimbursement or pricing of pharmaceuticals based on their therapeutic value. We adopt VBP as the policy context for this study. Unlike alternative approaches, VBP depends on an explicit relationship between price and incremental health outcomes and costs. This dependence makes VBP decisions especially sensitive to uncertainty about downstream costs and outcomes. A central question is whether—and how far—these components must be modeled beyond the trial period. A key gap is that the literature provides limited, generalizable conditions for when extrapolation is necessary for pricing conclusions versus when trial-period evidence is sufficient. This paper demonstrates the conditions under which it is possible to forgo modeling downstream costs beyond the clinical trial period for VBP purposes. It provides a series of specific mathematical proofs to support this approach. The proposed shortcuts reduce the burden and time required to produce evaluations. Furthermore, the shortcuts validate the robustness of decision models by allowing modelers to test whether applying these assumptions yields consistent results, enhancing the reliability of VBP methodologies.

Indexed as

ExtrapolationHealth careModelingPharmaceuticalsValue-based pricing

Identifiers

PMID41849120
PMCPMC13063489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.