ArticleFood science of animal resources2026
Development of a smartphone-based bone maturity classification algorithm with XAI for beef carcass grading.
Article in Food science of animal resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Korea, beef carcass quality grades are primarily determined based on the loin-eye muscle area and the degree of marbling. However, final grading decisions also consider additional factors, including carcass abnormalities such as the extent of cartilage ossification. Ossification is classified into nine levels, with lower levels indicating younger cattle. In the case of multiparous cows, which are generally older and exhibit higher ossification levels, a grade reduction is typically applied when the ossification level reaches 8 or 9. Traditionally, ossification levels have been assessed visually by human graders. However, the inherent subjectivity of this method has led to inconsistencies, highlighting the need for more objective, image-based assessment techniques. In this study, ossification levels ranging from 6 to 9 were documented using a smartphone camera, resulting in a dataset of 1,770 images per grade. To evaluate the ossification levels, object detection models including YOLO v8, v9, v10, and v11 were compared. All models achieved an accuracy exceeding 95%, demonstrating their potential for practical application in slaughterhouse environments. In particular, the YOLO v9m and YOLO v10m models showed the highest accuracy of 99.08% and 99.22%, respectively. Furthermore, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques such as Grad-CAM and LIME were applied to visually confirm that the deep learning models focused on regions relevant to carcass maturity. This study presents an efficient and reliable approach for assessing cartilage ossification using smartphone-based deep learning. The proposed method offers improved grading accuracy and consistency, supporting its adoption in modern meat processing facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.