Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41849062›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2026

Prediction-guided clustering for sepsis phenotyping: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Paul A Hilders, Lada Lijović, Martijn Otten, Laurens A Biesheuvel, Floor Hiemstra, Marcel van der Kuil, Ameet R Jagesar, P J Thoral, Ari Ercole, Paul W G Elbers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paul A HildersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.a.hilders@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1345-0433
Lada LijovićDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn OttenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laurens A BiesheuvelDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Floor HiemstraDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marcel van der KuilBBO.Life, Zutphen, The Netherlands.
Ameet R JagesarDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P J ThoralDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ari ErcoleUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Paul W G ElbersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with its heterogeneous and dynamically evolving clinical presentation complicating diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. The identification of clinically meaningful sub-phenotypes within the sepsis population could help tailor interventions and improve outcomes. However, existing phenotyping studies have yielded inconsistent results with limited clinical utility. In this study, we propose a novel, guided machine-learning approach to identify clinically relevant sub-phenotypes within the sepsis condition by integrating deep representation learning with prediction-guided clustering to capture temporal disease trajectories.

methodsWe trained a recurrent neural network-based encoder to generate compact, predictive representations of sepsis patients over time. During training, the encoder is guided by four auxiliary prediction objectives (i.e., 90-day mortality, remaining length of stay, need for mechanical ventilation, and need for renal replacement therapy), which encourage the model to create representations that are relevant with respect to patient-centred outcomes. After training, patient representations were clustered using the K-means algorithm. The identified sub-phenotypes were compared across two large ICU data sets (AmsterdamUMCdb and MIMIC-IV) and interpreted using Integrated Gradients-based attribution maps. Practical and clinical utility of the phenotypes was evaluated using a reinforcement learning framework to evaluate optimal treatment strategies within each sepsis sub-phenotype.

resultsThrough our approach, we identified six clinically distinct sub-phenotypes with varying risk profiles and presentations. The learned representations demonstrated robust generalisability across the different data sets, and the reinforcement learning results indicated that the different sub-phenotypes were associated with different optimal treatment strategies, highlighting the potential for phenotype-informed decision-making.

conclusionsThis study introduces a flexible and effective framework for the identification of robust and clinically meaningful sub-phenotypes within the population of sepsis patients. Moreover, the identified sub-phenotypes are clinically interpretable, and the proposed trajectory-aware phenotyping approach may support the future development of personalised and precision medicine strategies.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCritical careDeep learningMachine learningPhenotypeSepsis

Identifiers

PMID41849062
PMCPMC13000074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.