ArticleFood science of animal resources2026
Potential use of whey in kefir production: evaluation of fermentation kinetics and microbiota.
Article in Food science of animal resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was carried out on the effect of different amounts of whey on the kefir production process and the bacterial microbiota of the beverages. Fermentation was carried out by mixing commercial kefir grains with cow, sheep, and goat milk with their whey at concentrations of 0% (control group), 25%, 50%, and 75%. The bacterial microbiota in the produced beverages and the relative abundances of seven microorganisms (Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens, Lactobacillus kefiri, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactococcus lactis, Streptococcus thermophilus, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and acetic acid bacteria) were determined using metagenomic analysis targeting the V3-V4 region of 16 S rRNA gene, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), respectively. Lactococcus lactis and Leuconostoc mesenteroides were detected in higher abundance in whey-containing goat samples. While Lactobacillus was dominant in the cow milk samples containing 0%, 25%, and 50% whey, Enterococcus was dominant in the samples containing 75% whey. In sheep milk samples, Lactobacillus was dominant in samples with 75% and 50% whey, Lactococcus was dominant in samples with 25% whey, and Enterococcus was dominant in samples with no (0%) whey. Lactobacillus was dominant in all goat milk samples. In conclusion, high levels of lactic acid bacteria were shown to preserve their viability in the experimentally produced beverages with the addition of whey at different concentrations, and the whey could be used to produce kefir.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.