Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41849027›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

Cadaveric analyses of injectate distribution patterns in ultrasound-guided rotator interval, dual-target, and posterior glenohumeral injections.

Ondřej Naňka, Kamal Mezian, Ke-Vin Chang, Wei-Ting Wu, Vincenzo Ricci, Levent Özçakar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ondřej Naňka *Institute of Anatomy, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Kamal Mezian *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ke-Vin ChangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan. kvchang011@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7558-5651
Wei-Ting WuDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.
Vincenzo RicciPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milano, Italy.
Levent ÖzçakarDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 106-2314-B-002-180-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 109-2314-B-002-114-MY3National Science and Technology, Taiwan NSTC 112-2314-B-002-134National Science and Technology, Taiwan NSTC 113-2314-B-002 -208 -MY2National Science and Technology, Taiwan NSTC 113-2314-B-002 -209 -MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIntra-articular corticosteroid injection is a standard treatment for adhesive capsulitis and is commonly performed via the rotator interval or posterior glenohumeral approaches, with prior evidence favoring the former. Injectate distribution varies by technique. Additionally, a dual-target approach combining rotator interval and subdeltoid bursal injections has been proposed for subacromial impingement. This study compared dye distribution among rotator interval, dual-target, and posterior glenohumeral injection techniques. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis cadaveric study evaluated dye spread in 18 shoulders from nine embalmed cadavers. Three ultrasound-guided techniques were assessed: rotator interval injection (15 mL), dual-target injection (10 mL rotator interval + 5 mL subdeltoid bursa), and posterior glenohumeral injection (15 mL). Following the injection, systematic dissection was performed. Staining of the subdeltoid bursa, long head of the biceps tendon sheath, anterior glenohumeral capsule, and posterior glenohumeral capsule was graded as absent, partial, or extensive.

resultsExtensive staining of the biceps tendon sheath and anterior glenohumeral capsule was observed in all shoulders receiving rotator interval or dual-target injections, whereas posterior glenohumeral injections showed inconsistent coverage of these structures. Reliable subdeltoid bursal infiltration occurred only in the dual-target group (5/6 shoulders). The posterior glenohumeral capsule was most consistently and extensively stained following posterior glenohumeral injection (6/6), with moderate coverage in the rotator interval and dual-target groups. Infraspinatus infiltration was uncommon and observed only after posterior glenohumeral injection.

conclusionThe injection technique markedly influences shoulder injectate distribution. Rotator interval and dual-target approaches preferentially address anterior structures, the dual-target technique ensures subdeltoid bursal coverage, and the posterior approach most consistently infiltrates the posterior glenohumeral capsule. Technique selection should be guided by the predominant pathological target in adhesive capsulitis and related disorders. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Dual-target and rotator interval approaches reliably infiltrate the anterior capsule, making them suitable for adhesive capsulitis with biceps long head pathology, whereas the posterior glenohumeral approach primarily covers the posterior capsule and is less suitable for concomitant anterior shoulder disorders. KEY POINTS: The injection technique determines the injectate distribution in the shoulder. Dual-target and rotator interval injections ensure anterior capsule infiltration. The posterior approach best targets the posterior capsule.

Indexed as

InterventionPainRotator cuffShoulderUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41849027
PMCPMC13000091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.