SynthesisVeterinary research communications2026
Global distribution of Neorickettsia risticii, the causative agent of potomac horse fever: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Potomac Horse Fever (PHF), also known as equine neorickettsiosis (EN) or equine monocytic ehrlichiosis is an acute, potentially fatal infectious disease in horses caused by the monocytotropic rickettsia bacterium Neorickettsia risticii. This obligate intracellular bacterium is maintained throughout the life cycle of digenetic trematodes which utilize multiple intermediate and definitive hosts. Research on N. risticii is scattered across multiple continents, with most studies originating from North and South America. Therefore, a systematic review is needed to consolidate global evidence, clarify the geographic distribution and host range of this pathogen, and identify knowledge gaps to guide future surveillance, diagnosis, and control strategies. Therefore, we conducted the first systematic review of the distribution of Neorickettsia risticii in horses and invertebrates. A comprehensive search of five electronic databases was performed to retrieve studies that reported the occurrence of N. risticii. Retrieved records were screened and assessed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. Twenty-seven eligible studies published between 1990 and 2024 were included in the qualitative synthesis of this review. The reported prevalence in horses varied widely by diagnostic method: serological surveys detected N. risticii antibodies in 5.45%–26.6% of sampled populations, whereas molecular assays reported PCR positivity ranging from 0%–14.38%. Neorickettsia risticii DNA has also been detected in a variety of invertebrate and wildlife hosts, including bats, trematodes, snails, aquatic insects, and soft ticks. These findings highlight the complex ecology of N. risticii and its presence across diverse host groups, although its prevalence remains generally low. The distribution of studies was geographically skewed towards North America, revealing significant gaps in surveillance in other regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.