Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41848942›Full record

ArticleFood science of animal resources2026

Quality characteristics of fermented milk pudding with pumpkin seed powder.

Seon-Ok Jang, Sin-Young Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science of animal resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seon-Ok JangDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University, Kongju, Republic of Korea.
Sin-Young ParkDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University, Kongju, Republic of Korea. parksy@kongju.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study developed and evaluated the quality of fermented milk puddings containing pumpkin seed powder. The samples were classified as P1, P2, and P3 (1%, 2%, and 3%, respectively) based on the amount of pumpkin seed powder added. The quality properties were analyzed based on pH, CIE color, total aerobic bacteria, lactic acid bacteria counts, electronic nose, electronic tongue, and sensory evaluation. The pH of the samples decreased significantly with increasing pumpkin seed powder content (p < 0.05). Both lactic acid bacteria and total aerobic bacteria increased significantly with increasing pumpkin seed powder concentrations (p < 0.05). The aroma and taste profiles of the samples improved with the addition of pumpkin seed powder. Sensory evaluation revealed that the control sample received lower scores for most traits, whereas the P2 sample achieved higher scores for appearance, flavor, and overall acceptability. These results suggest that adding pumpkin seed powder alters pH and the composition of lactic acid bacteria, potentially enhancing the product's unique acidity. In various treatments, the P2 level was identified as the optimal addition for fermented milk pudding.

Indexed as

Agricultural wasteDairy productFermented milk puddingPumpkin seed powder

Identifiers

PMID41848942
PMCPMC12994971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.