ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026
Revisiting Emotional Effects Under Lexical Control in L2 Auditory Word Recognition Memory.
Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emotional valence and arousal have been shown to influence word recognition and memory, yet evidence from second language (L2) contexts remains mixed and task-dependent. The present study examined whether emotional valence and arousal modulate auditory recognition memory for L2 English words encoded in emotionally valenced audiovisual discourse among Chinese EFL learners at an upper-intermediate proficiency level. Stimulus words were drawn from authentic news videos and pre-rated for emotional and lexical properties. Participants first encountered target words embedded in audiovisual news clips and were later tested on isolated auditory tokens, such that the task indexed recognition memory rather than real-time auditory lexical access. Reaction times and accuracy were analyzed using trial-level generalized additive mixed models, allowing for nonlinear effects while controlling for lexical variables (frequency or familiarity, number of syllables) and random variability across participants and items. Across analyses, emotional effects were not robust. Neither valence nor arousal reliably predicted recognition accuracy. A small valence effect on reaction time emerged only in frequency-controlled models including both correct and incorrect responses, and disappeared when analyses were restricted to correct trials. In contrast, lexical frequency consistently facilitated responses, and substantial variance was attributable to individual- and item-level differences. Overall, emotional effects in L2 auditory word recognition appear weak, conditional, and sensitive to analytical choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41848915What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.