ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
Evolving strategies in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: myosin inhibitors as monotherapy compared with beta-blockers.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mavacamten in adolescent obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: SCOUTing a way forward.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is characterized by asymmetric hypertrophy, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, and impaired diastolic function. β-adrenergic blockers (BB) have long been the cornerstone of medical therapy, providing symptomatic improvement but without disease-modifying effects. Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs), including mavacamten and aficamten, represent a new therapeutic class targeting the hypercontractile sarcomere. Randomized trials have demonstrated substantial reductions in LVOT gradients and improvements in exercise capacity, New York Heart Association functional class, and quality of life, with an acceptable safety profile. Subgroup analyses from EXPLORER-HCM and FOREST-HCM suggested that concomitant BB therapy may blunt the exercise capacity benefits of CMIs. The MAPLE-HCM trial provided the first direct head-to-head comparison, showing that aficamten monotherapy was superior to metoprolol in improving peak oxygen uptake, functional status, and hemodynamic parameters. Current evidence indicates that CMIs offer greater efficacy than BB in improving exercise tolerance and LVOT obstruction in oHCM, supporting their role as potential first-line therapy. However, long-term safety, durability of benefit, optimal sequencing, and patient selection require further study. BBs remain clinically relevant for specific patient subgroups, but the advent of CMIs marks a paradigm shift from symptomatic relief toward targeted disease modification in oHCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.