Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41848895›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2026

Save the ovary: evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of the pediatric risk of malignancy index (PRMI) to prevent unnecessary oophorectomy in girls.

Naimah Raza, Yadava Jeve

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Naimah RazaBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TG, UK. naimah.raza@nhs.net.
Yadava JeveBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the Pediatric Risk of Malignancy Index (PRMI) for distinguishing benign from malignant ovarian lesions in the pediatric and adolescent population, and to model its potential role in avoiding unnecessary oophorectomies.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of females aged ≤18 years who underwent oophorectomy with histopathology between 2006 and 2016 at a UK tertiary hospital. Only patients with preoperative imaging were included. PRMI scores were retrospectively calculated, with a cut-off ≥7 indicating high malignancy risk. Diagnostic performance was assessed against final histology using standard accuracy measures.

resultsOf 265 ovarian specimens, 44 met inclusion criteria; 9 (20.5%) were malignant and 35 (79.5%) benign. PRMI showed a sensitivity of 77.8% (95% CI 45.2-94.4%), specificity 74.3% (95% CI 56.4-86.4%), positive predictive value 43.8%, and negative predictive value 92.9%. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.03 (95% CI 1.45-6.35) and 0.30 (95% CI 0.09-0.99), indicating moderate clinical utility. Notably, 79.5% of oophorectomies were performed for lesions that were ultimately proven benign. If PRMI had been used to guide management, 26/35 (74.3%) benign oophorectomies could potentially have been avoided.

conclusionThe PRMI demonstrated moderate accuracy and a high negative predictive value in this cohort, supporting its potential role as an adjunctive tool in preoperative risk stratification of pediatric ovarian masses. Greater emphasis on ovary-sparing strategies is warranted to mitigate long-term reproductive and hormonal consequences in young patients.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyUnnecessary ProceduresAdolescentChildFemaleHumansOvaryRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityFertility preservationOophorectomyOvarian massPediatric gynecologyPediatric risk of malignancy index (PRMI)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.