ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Chronic posterior locked shoulder dislocation-When should the joint be preserved and when should it be replaced?]
Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic locked posterior shoulder dislocation (LPSD) mainly affects younger or middle-aged, functionally active patients-often as a result of seizures or electric shocks. THERAPY: The duration of dislocation and the size of the reverse Hill--Sachs lesion are decisive factors in the choice of treatment. Joint-preserving procedures are considered the treatment of choice for defects of less than 45-50% of the humeral articular surface and enable good functional results through anatomical reconstruction, preferably using a corticospongious autograft. Extra-anatomical procedures can be used for smaller defects, but are functionally limited. JOINT REPLACEMENT: Joint replacement is indicated when reconstructive procedures are no longer possible due to large bone defects or additional soft tissue damage. In younger patients, it should be used with caution due to functional limitations and possible complications, while reverse shoulder arthroplasty is the last option for older patients or those with irreparable rotator cuffs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41848888What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.