ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2026
Integrating microplastics into thermal biology in an insect.
Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastics (MPs) are small-sized (< 5 mm) bits of plastic present in all types of environments, including terrestrial ecosystems that are rapidly warming. Yet, the biological interplay between MPs and temperature is poorly understood in terrestrial animals. Here, we addressed three hypotheses to determine how: (1) temperature influences biological responses to MPs, (2) MPs influence thermal biology, and (3) temperature and MPs combine to influence the acquisition and allocation of resources. Specifically, we fed field crickets (Gryllus lineaticeps) different concentrations of nylon (polyamide) microfilaments while they were maintained at 23 °C, 28 °C, or 33 °C. Despite ingesting 2.5-fold more MPs, warmer individuals did not absorb more MPs into their bodies. Exposure to MPs increased investment into somatic tissue and self-maintenance, but individuals consuming MPs still had lower desiccation tolerance. Warming and MPs both promoted food consumption, but they differentially affected the life-history tradeoff between investment into self-maintenance vs. reproduction. In sum, appetite, life-history strategy, and dynamics in the digestive tract may be critical to animals simultaneously exposed to warming and MPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.