ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026
Better & systematic trauma care (BEST) in Norway: from a local quality improvement project to a national collaborative.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHealthcare professionals in Norwegian local hospitals have focused on the need for improved trauma care since the late 1990s. Because of lack of national guidelines the hospital management of patients with serious trauma varied. The authors and colleague health care providers felt a need for improvement. Therefore, a project called Better & Systematic Trauma care (BEST) was established. The goal was to improve trauma care through training and preparation for infrequently occurring situations, with a focus on the team.
methodsThe project began as a bottom-up initiative in four local hospitals. Through cross-professional team training and local simulation, staff built competence in trauma care and practised non-technical skills such as communication, cooperation, leadership, and decision-making in their local setting. Creating a national meeting place for all hospitals was essential for fostering collaboration across institutions.
resultsA 1-day team course was developed and adopted nationwide. Network meetings have enabled the collaborative development of tools and training materials without national strategic leadership or external influence. Over time, the focus shifted from individual professions to the trauma team. A damage-control surgery course was created for all surgical teams. All materials remained freely available, and the project operated independently of the government, organisations, or industry.
conclusionThe BEST Project showed that local bottom-up initiatives can effectively improve clinical care. Facilitating professional interaction based on local needs is essential. The project also illustrates how a small, locally driven quality improvement effort can be scaled nationwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.